翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R. v. Thomas Equipment Ltd. : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Thomas Equipment Ltd
''R v Thomas Equipment Ltd'', () 2 S.C.R. 529, is a major decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the extraterritorial limits of the Constitution of Canada.
Thomas Equipment Ltd, a farm equipment supplier based on New Brunswick, sold machinery to a reseller in Alberta. Under Alberta law suppliers were required to buy back unsold equipment upon termination of the contract. The New Brunswick supplier argued that as they were not based on Alberta they were not subject to the Alberta law.
The majority of the Court held that Alberta law did apply to Thomas Equipment. In the Court's view, the company's decision to supply and market their goods in Alberta caused it to be subject to all the laws of the province.
==See also==

* List of Supreme Court of Canada cases

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Thomas Equipment Ltd」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.